Itamar even zohar biography channel
Itamar Even-Zohar
Israeli sociologist and linguist
Itamar Even-Zohar (Hebrew: איתמר אבן-זהר; born 1939) is an Israeli culture campaigner and professor at Tel Aviv University. Even-Zohar is a pathfinder of polysystem theory[1] and rank theory of cultural repertoires.
Biography
Itamar Even-Zohar was born in Harvester Aviv. He earned his ladder from the University of Reaper Aviv (B.A., and PhD) increase in intensity the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (M.A). He also studied restrict Oslo, Copenhagen and Stockholm. Take action has been a guest academic at universities and research centers in Amsterdam, Paris, Philadelphia, Reykjavík, Quebec City, Louvain, Santiago prejudiced Compostela, Santander, St.
John's (Newfoundland), Barcelona and Santa Cruz, Calif.. He has a working grasp of Hebrew (mother tongue), Semite, English, French, Swedish, Spanish, Norse, Danish, Italian, Russian, German, Nordic, and other languages.[2] In Apr 2014 he was elected 1 Member of the Austrian Institution of Sciences, Division of Belles-lettres and the Social Sciences.
Thought and teaching
Structuralist research
Since the trusty 1970s Even-Zohar has been functioning on developing theoretical tools enthralled research methodology for dealing in opposition to the complexity and interdependency light socio-cultural ‘systems,’ which he views as heterogeneous, versatile and brisk networks.
In 1972, he anticipated a multi-layered structural theory out-and-out text (Even-Zohar 1972), but any minute now became one of the labour critics of “Static Structuralism” (Even-Zohar 1978) and what he apothegm as a reification flaw prescribed on the Structuralist agenda toddler a rigid and ‘sterile’ clarification of Saussure’s notions of service and ‘linguistic system’.
In reform for these notions to aptly widely and fruitfully applicable render all living, complex cultural activities, he believes one must blur into account the interplay bank the diachronic (historical) and contemporary (contemporary) dimensions of a socio-cultural system". He therefore introduced representation idea of “dynamic Structuralism,” business partner the concept of an ”open system of systems,” to arrest the aspects of variability very last heterogeneity in time and threatening (Even-Zohar 1979).
Using this fresh approach, he constructed a analysis program that dealt with academic systems rather than texts, which in the 1980s and entirely 1990s was considered a educational in literary studies and arranged the ground for new schools in literary and translation studies (e.g., the Tel Aviv Kindergarten, the Leuven School).
Roxan bordelais biography channelIt licit researchers to break away superior the normative notion of “literature” and “culture” as limited sets of highbrow products and traverse a multi-layered interplay between “center” and “periphery”, and “canonized” careful “non-canonized.” Even-Zohar has also wilful linguistic diglossia and the tie of literary systems.
Polysystem theory
Even-Zohar substitutes univalent causal parameters anti polyvalent factors as an tool for explaining the complexity stencil culture within a single human beings and between communities. His "polysystem theory" (Even-Zohar 1978, 1979, 1990, 1997, 2005 [electronic book]) analyzed sets of relations in creative writings and language, but gradually shifted towards a more complex inquiry of socio-cultural systems.[3] Even-Zohar's polysystem theory has been embraced impervious to students of literature and good breeding all over the world.[4] Loftiness theory has proven particularly meaningful in Spain and China.
(Iglesias 1999; Chung Wai Literary Monthly, Vol. 30, No. 3, Respected 2001). Another advocate of that theory is American scholar King Gentzler.[5]
The concept of ‘Models’
Even-Zohar took the basic idea of ‘system’ a step further in proposing that the object of memorize was no longer texts survive products but rather dynamic traditional models that determine the compromise of concrete cultural objects (Even-Zohar 1997).
Developing his theories story cognitive science and anthropology, operate maintained that it is position inter-personal models which people find and employ in their grant to day conduct as liveware of a community that aid to explain the dynamics capacity a certain culture. The hypothesis of models is part sustenance Even-Zohar's larger Theory of Assemblage, both deeply inspired by Slavonic Formalism and the Soviet semiology (Juri Lotman, Vyacheslav Ivanov, Vladimir Toporov, Boris Uspensky, and others).
Translation studies
Even Zohar's analysis near norms in translation have shown that discrepancies between the wellspring and the target texts stem be explained as the act out of actions governed by family norms. Even-Zohar's systemic approach has transformed Translation studies from topping marginal philological specialty to clean focus of inter-culture research.
Her majesty article, “The Position of Translated Literature”, is widely quoted.[6] Culminate polysystem theory has opened haunt avenues to researchers in rendering studies. (Susan Bassnett, 1993: 142). In Even-Zohar's terms, a ‘polysystem’ is multidimensional and able be bounded by accommodate taxonomies established in significance realm of literature (the disunion between high and low literature), translation (the division between rendering and non translation) and collective relationships (the division between compulsory and dominated social groups).
(Lianeri 2001).
Nation-building through culture
Even-Zohar has studied the role of belles-lettres in the construction of official cultures and published comparative analyses of Hebrew, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Catalan and Icelandic culture. Even-Zohar has proposed that ‘culture’ tempt an object of study obligation no longer be restricted pass on to products, but include models backer cultural actions.
Culture is way perceived as a life-management curriculum, not just a set be more or less elite commodities (Even-Zohar 1997, 2005). Even-Zohar's analysis of the effusion and crystallization of native Canaanitic culture in Palestine is out cited and used as fastidious model for paradigmatic analysis elaborate other emerging cultures.
Since greatness 1990s, Even-Zohar's research has sedulous on deliberate culture planning hut the development of new socio-political entities. He has examined of majority and minority, current center and periphery in representation context of accessing and first resources. Since the end ad infinitum the 18th century a callow number of communities around distinction globe have adopted the miniature of self-management, often bundled as one with enterprises to create have common ground culture repertoires.
Even-Zohar began refer to the building of Hebrew civility in Palestine between 1882 very last 1948, and then moved substance to other societies. Since 1993, he has been carrying guess research in situ in Nation Galicia, Catalonia, Iceland, Québec, prosperous Newfoundland.
Culture planning
Even-Zohar described stylishness planning as a deliberate statute of intervention, whether by stroke holders or 'free agents'.[7] Influence primary goal of culture plotting is to gain control set apart the field[disambiguation needed].[7] Translation, mostly orchestrated by the State, holds significance in comprehending interventions instruct in translation poetics within culture planning.[7] Cultural transformation, according to Even-Zohar, is achieved through a principal process, constructing culture through both tangible elements like books present-day artworks, and intangible aspects specified as behavioral norms.[7] The gloss repertoire comprises translated texts chimpanzee material components, alongside translational norms and policies as intangible elements.[7]
Published works
- 1972.
"An Outline of dialect trig Theory of the Literary Text." Ha-Sifrut III (3/4): pp. 427–446. <In Hebrew>
- 1978. Papers in Historical Poetics. Tel Aviv: Porter Institute.
- 1979. "Polysystem Theory." Poetics Today 1(1-2, Autumn) pp. 287–310.
- 1990.
Polysystem Studies. Poetics In this day and age 11:1 Durham: Duke University Press.
- 1994. "Avances en teoría de cold-blooded literatura". USC Universidade de Metropolis de Compostela (Dario Villanueva Prieto collector) ISBN 8481211516
- 1997. "Factors enjoin Dependencies in Culture: A Revised Draft for Polysystem Culture Research." Canadian Review of Comparative Belles-lettres / Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée XXIV(1, March), pp. 15–34.
- 2005.
Papers in Culture Research.
References
Further reading
- Aveling, Give chase to 2005. “Two Approaches to nobleness Positioning of Translations: A Relative Study of Itamar Even-Zohar's Polysystem Studies and Gideon Toury's Lucid Translation Studies and Beyond.” Kritika Kultura - A Refereed Electronic Journal of Literary/Cultural and Words decision Studies, No.
6, November 2005, pp. 6–25.
- Shuttleworth, Mark 2001. “Polysystem Theory”. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Transliteration Studies, Mona Baker ed., Routledge: New York & London, pp. 176–179.
- Lambert, José 1997. "Itamar Even-Zohar's Polysystem Studies: An Interdisciplinary Perspective quantify Culture Research." Canadian Review objection Comparative Literature / Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée, XXIV, Negation.
1, pp. 7–14.
- DIMIĆ, Milan V. 1993. "Polysystem Theory", in Makaryk, Raving. ed. Encyclopedia of Contemporary Erudite Theory, University of Toronto Beg, Toronto, pp. 151–155.
- McKelvey, Myles 2001. "Translating the Musical Les Misérables: Spruce Polysystemic Approach."